During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Physicists demonstrate how entangled quantum particles can improve the sensitivity of non-local, long-distance light phase measurements such as for telescope arrays observing faint astronomical objects
，更多细节参见safew官方版本下载
if (deflate.result) yield [deflate.result];
Спортивный арбитражный суд (CAS) оценил решение Международной федерации лыжного спорта и сноуборда (FIS) отстранить российских лыжников от участия в соревнованиях. Суд назвал его дискриминационным, о чем сообщается на его сайте.，详情可参考爱思助手下载最新版本
“一起奔向共同富裕的美好明天”
Deep writing about biology, delivered to your inbox. Always free.，推荐阅读WPS官方版本下载获取更多信息